April 23, 2014   92 notes
think-progress:

Oops: New records show IRS targeted progressive groups more extensively than Tea Party groups.

think-progress:

Oops: New records show IRS targeted progressive groups more extensively than Tea Party groups.

(via smdxn)

April 23, 2014   19,590 notes

bricksandmortarandchewinggum:

holdmypurse:

Remember when Romney lost the election so somebody created White People Mourning Romney and collected various people crying over Romney’s loss

Still so funny.

(via meadowhillele)

April 22, 2014   409 notes
The partisan nature of hate crimes

The partisan nature of hate crimes

(Source: editorialcartoonists.com, via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

April 22, 2014   31 notes

These days, the GOP tone and agenda are set by a voting bloc of mostly white, blue-collar workers whose sensibilities skew more toward NASCAR than golf. In a general election, the party’s most reliable supporters are white voters without college degrees. And they increasingly control the contest for the White House nod: In 2008, according to a tabulation of exit-poll data acquired by the National Journal, blue-collar workers made up 51 percent of all GOP primary voters…

“Ten years ago a Republican primary was decided by who has the best resume,” said Joel McElhannon, an Atlanta-based GOP strategist. “Having broader experience was considered a big plus, but we’ve seen this shift over the last several years. There is this populist strain going through the Republican primary electorate, and now it’s less about experience and it’s more about being an outsider. It’s less about being qualified than who is more angry and more likely to ruffle feathers.

Alex Roarty"The Class Warfare Within the Republican Party" (via holygoddamnshitballs)

April 22, 2014   7 notes

“ BREAKING: Supreme Court upholds white supremacy in Michigan college admissions. ”

(via teapartycat)

April 22, 2014   1,094 notes
socimages:

How to lie with statistics: The relationship between Florida’s Stand Your Ground law and gun deaths.
At Junk Charts, Kaiser Fung drew my attention to a graph released by Reuters.  It is so deeply misleading that I loathe to expose your eyeballs to it.  So, I offer you the mishmash above.
The original figure is on the left.  It counts the number of gun deaths in Florida.  A line rises, bounces a little, reaches a 2nd highest peak labeled “2005, Florida enacted its ‘Stand Your Ground’ law,” and falls precipitously.
What do you see?
Most people see a huge fall-off in the number of gun deaths after Stand Your Ground was passed.  But that’s not what the graph shows.  A quick look at the vertical axis reveals that the gun deaths are counted from top (0) to bottom (800).  The highest peaks are the fewest gun deaths and the lowest ones are the most.  A rise in the line, in other words, reveals a reduction in gun deaths.  The graph on the right — flipped both horizontally and vertically — is more intuitive to most: a rising line reflects a rise in the number of gun deaths and a dropping a drop.
The proper conclusion, then, is that gun deaths skyrocketed after Stand Your Ground was enacted.
This example is a great reminder that we bring our own assumptions to our reading of any illustration of data.  The original graph may have broken convention, making the intuitive read of the image incorrect, but the data is, presumably, sound.  It’s our responsibility, then, to always do our due diligence in absorbing information.  The alternative is to be duped.
Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College and the author of Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions, with Myra Marx Ferree. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

socimages:

How to lie with statistics: The relationship between Florida’s Stand Your Ground law and gun deaths.

At Junk Charts, Kaiser Fung drew my attention to a graph released by Reuters.  It is so deeply misleading that I loathe to expose your eyeballs to it.  So, I offer you the mishmash above.

The original figure is on the left.  It counts the number of gun deaths in Florida.  A line rises, bounces a little, reaches a 2nd highest peak labeled “2005, Florida enacted its ‘Stand Your Ground’ law,” and falls precipitously.

What do you see?

Most people see a huge fall-off in the number of gun deaths after Stand Your Ground was passed.  But that’s not what the graph shows.  A quick look at the vertical axis reveals that the gun deaths are counted from top (0) to bottom (800).  The highest peaks are the fewest gun deaths and the lowest ones are the most.  A rise in the line, in other words, reveals a reduction in gun deaths.  The graph on the right — flipped both horizontally and vertically — is more intuitive to most: a rising line reflects a rise in the number of gun deaths and a dropping a drop.

The proper conclusion, then, is that gun deaths skyrocketed after Stand Your Ground was enacted.

This example is a great reminder that we bring our own assumptions to our reading of any illustration of data.  The original graph may have broken convention, making the intuitive read of the image incorrect, but the data is, presumably, sound.  It’s our responsibility, then, to always do our due diligence in absorbing information.  The alternative is to be duped.

Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College and the author of Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions, with Myra Marx Ferree. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

(via cognitivedissonance)

April 21, 2014   37 notes
republicanidiots:

Libertarians:  ”If it’s not in the original Constitution it doesn’t count.” 
Libertarians:  ”Unless it’s the 2nd Amendment. That one counts.” 

republicanidiots:

Libertarians:  ”If it’s not in the original Constitution it doesn’t count.” 

Libertarians:  ”Unless it’s the 2nd Amendment. That one counts.” 

(Source: thatlibertarian)

April 21, 2014   409 notes
liberalsarecool:

Tea Klan: take ownership of your ignorance and failed narratives.

teabagger = scared, white douche bag

liberalsarecool:

Tea Klan: take ownership of your ignorance and failed narratives.

teabagger = scared, white douche bag

April 21, 2014   170 notes
#Climate #Evolution #Economics #Taxation #Equality #WomensRights #LGBT #Guns #Environment #Religion

#Climate #Evolution #Economics #Taxation #Equality #WomensRights #LGBT #Guns #Environment #Religion

(Source: liberalsarecool)

April 21, 2014   169 notes
politicalprof:

This photo, of private citizens in a standoff with federal officers in the Cliven Bundy standoff in Nevada, is something of an American political rohrsach test.
—if you see wacko gun nuts threatening federal officers trying to enforce a court order, you’re what known as *right.*
—if you see American patriots standing down a dictatorial government come to crush human freedom, you are what is known as *wrong*. And you are a wackadoo.
Please understand that while those are very technical terms, they are the correct ones in this case.

politicalprof:

This photo, of private citizens in a standoff with federal officers in the Cliven Bundy standoff in Nevada, is something of an American political rohrsach test.

—if you see wacko gun nuts threatening federal officers trying to enforce a court order, you’re what known as *right.*

—if you see American patriots standing down a dictatorial government come to crush human freedom, you are what is known as *wrong*. And you are a wackadoo.

Please understand that while those are very technical terms, they are the correct ones in this case.